Comments
by
Aleister
Crowley: |
So much
for the profane. For the aspirant I wrote the book called
De
Lege Libellum, otherwise called The Sandal,
in which I analysed the Law as the source of light, life, love
and liberty, and pronounced a panegyric upon it in each of these
respects successively. For sustained sublimity of prose this
book perhaps ranks next to those in which my pen was definitely
and authentically inspired. (The criterion of such inspiration,
by the way, is that in the case of an inspired book such as
Liber
VII or Liber LXV I do not dare to “change
as much as the style of a letter”. I show, in fact, precisely
that reverence for the author which should always be observed by
the mere editor, and in this case, having not only the
manuscript but my memory to assist me in case of any question
arising as to the text in consequence of what my earliest tutor
would doubtless have considered imperfections of caligraphy,
there is fortunately no reason for anxiety as to the critical
perfection of the text.)
The above remarks may appear strange as a preliminary to the
statement that I regarded and still regard this book The
Sandal as essentially an exercise in technique undertaken in
order to fit myself to write
Liber
Aleph, The Book of Wisdom or Folly, which is
beyond question a consummate masterpiece in its particular
sphere in literature. It has always been my custom to practise
with a rapier very thoroughly before fighting a duel. If
occasionally these friendly bouts have resulted in a few deaths
— the more the merrier!
Liber
Aleph, The Book of Wisdom or Folly was intended
to express the heart of my doctrine in the most deep and
delicate dimensions. (Before using the word dimensions many
considerations occurred to me. It is startling; that quality
itself is not repugnant to its use in such a connection. Its use
was followed by a discussion between myself and my cynocephalus,
who was herself struck by the singularity of the word, so much
so, that I had to warn her not to spell it with two d’s, and my
explanations, thought unsatisfactory, decided me to insert this
note in the text of my autohagiography.)
Liber
Aleph is the most tense and intense book that I
have ever composed. The thought is so concentrated and, if I may
use the word, nervous, that both to write then, and to read now,
involved an involves an almost intolerable strain. I remember
how I used to sit at my desk night after night — it was the
bitterest winter that had been known in New York for many years — but even if the central heating had been the flames of hell
itself, I doubt whether I should have been warm. Night after
night I sat, all through, rigid as a corpse, and icier; the
whole of my life concentrated in two spots; the small section of
my brain which was occupied in the work, and my right wrist and
fingers. I remember with absolute clearness that my
consciousness appeared to start from a perfectly dead forearm.
The book is written in prose, yet there is a formal
circumscription more imminent than anything which would have
been possible in poetry. I limited myself by making a point of
dealing thoroughly with a given subject in a single page. It was
an acute agony, similar to that of Asana, to write, and the
effort removed me so far from normal human consciousness that
there was something indicibly ghastly in its unnaturalness when
I got into bed in full daylight in the hope of acquiring a
particle of warmth from the complacent Camel.
— The Confessions of Aleister Crowley. New
York, NY. Hill and Wang, 1969. Pages 831-832. |
|