|
WHY
JESUS
WEPT
(Fourth Impression)
|
|
»»
Download
Facsimile of Original Book «« |
|
Image
Thumbnails |
Title: |
Why Jesus
Wept.
A Study of Society and of The Grace of God. |
|
Upper Cover
Lower Cover
Turned-In Cover
Spine
Title Page
|
Print
Variations: |
Printed on Japanese vellum.1
Pages unopened.1
Bound in turned-in green wrappers.1
Upper cover lettered in black ‘Aleister Crowley | WHY |
JESUS | WEPT’.1
Lower cover has Phillipe Renouard’s colophon.1
Spine lettered vertically up spine ‘WHY JESUS WEPT’.1
10 7/16” x 8”.1 |
|
|
Publisher: |
Society
for the Propagation of Religious Truth (S.P.R.T.).1 |
|
Printer: |
Philippe
Renouard, 19 rue des Saints Peres, 19, Paris.1 |
|
Published At: |
Boleskine,
Foyers, Inverness.1 |
|
Date: |
1905.1 |
|
Edition: |
Fourth
Impression.1 |
|
Pages: |
xii + 80 +
ii.1 |
|
Price: |
Priced at
21 shillings.2 |
|
Remarks: |
Title page
printed in black and red and states “Fourth Impression.” The
title page additionally states the publisher as “Society for the
Propagation of Religious Truth”, “Boleskine Foyers Inverness.”
The
second,
third
and fourth impressions are missing the following items
present in the
first
and
fifth
impressions:
- Advertisement for the book
- Letter from the author’s mother
- Dedicatio Maxima (To his unborn child) |
|
Pagination:1 |
Page(s) |
|
[α-β]
|
Blank |
[ i] |
Half title |
[ ii] |
Blank |
[ iii] |
Title page |
[ iv] |
Blank |
[ v] |
Persons Studied |
[ vi] |
Quotation from Times and Bible
‘At 30, Clarendon Square, Leamington, on October 12,
1875 A.D. the | wife of Edward Crowley of a son. | “The
Times” | JESUS WEPT | “John” 11.35’ |
[ vii] |
Dedicatio Minima (To Christ) |
[ viii] |
Dedicatio Minor (To Lady S.) |
[ ix] |
Dedicatio Major (To Buddhist monks) |
[x-xi] |
Dedicatio Extraordinaria (To G.K. Chesterton) |
[ xii] |
Blank |
[1-80] |
Text |
[ i] |
Phillipe Renouard’s colophon |
[ ii] |
Blank |
|
|
Contents: |
|
|
Author’s
Working
Versions: |
|
|
Other
Known
Editions: |
+ |
Why Jesus Wept, Privately published, Paris, 1904. (First Impression) |
+ |
Why Jesus Wept, Society for the Propagation of Religious Truth (S.P.R.T.),
Boleskine, Foyers, Inverness, 1904. (Second Impression) |
+ |
Why Jesus Wept, Society for the Propagation of Religious Truth (S.P.R.T.),
Boleskine, Foyers, Inverness, 1905. (Third Impression) |
+ |
Why Jesus Wept, Society for the Propagation of Religious Truth (S.P.R.T.),
Boleskine, Foyers, Inverness, 1905. (Fifth Impression) |
+ |
The Collected Works of Aleister Crowley, Vol. III,
Society for the Propagation of Religious Truth,
Boleskine, Foyers, Inverness, 1907. |
|
|
Bibliographic
Sources: |
1. |
Dianne Frances Rivers, A Bibliographic List with
Special Reference To the Collection at the University of
Texas, Master of Arts Thesis, The University
of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1967, p. 44. |
2. |
Aleister Crowley, Mortadello, Catalog “The Works
of Mr. Aleister Crowley,”, bound in back of book,
Wieland and Co., London, 1912. |
|
|
Comments
by
Aleister
Crowley: |
The
intensity of my repulsion makes me suspect that I wanted to make
love to her and was annoyed that I was already in love. The
gospels do not tell us whether the man who possessed the pearl
of great price ever had moments of regret at having given up
imitation jewelry. One always subconsciously connects
notoriously vile women who flaunt their heartless and sexless
seduction with the possibility of some supremely perverse
pleasure in nastiness. However, my surface reaction was to shake
the dust of Colombo from my feet and to spend my two days in
Kandy in writing Why Jesus Wept.
The title
is a direct allusion to the ladies in question. I prefaced the
play with five dedications to (1) Christ, (2) Lady Scott, (3) my
friends (Jinawaravasa, whom I had met once more in Galle, and
myself), (4) my unborn child, and (5) Mr. G. K. Chesterton. (He
had written a long congratulatory criticism of my The Soul of
Osiris.) The idea of the play is to show a romantic boy and
girl ambushed and ruined by male and female vampires. It is an
allegory of the corrupting influence of society, and the moral
is given in the final passage:
|
I much
prefer—that is, mere I—
Solitude to society.
And that is why I sit and spoil
So much clean paper with such toil
By Kandy Lake in far Ceylon.
I have my old pyjamas on:
I shake my soles from Britain’s dust;
I shall not go there till I must;
And when I must!—I hold my nose.
Farewell, you filthy-minded people!
I know a stable from a steeple.
Farewell, my decent-minded friends!
I know arc lights from candle-ends.
Farewell-a poet begs your alms,
Will walk awhile among the palms,
An honest love, a loyal kiss,
Can show him better worlds than this;
Nor will he come again to yours
While he knows champak-stars from sewers. |
(This play
has been analysed in such detail by Captain J. F. C. Fuller in
The Star in the West that it would be impertinent of me
to discuss it further.)
— The Confessions of Aleister Crowley.
New York, NY. Hill and Wang, 1969. Page2 384-385.
______________________________
My
activities as a publisher were at this time remarkable. I had
issued The God-Eater and The Star & the Garter
through Charles Watts & Co. of the Rationalist Press
Association, but there was still no such demand for my books as
to indicate that I had touched the great heart of the British
public. I decided that it would save trouble to publish them
myself. I decided to call myself the Society for the Propagation
of Religious Truth, and issued The Argonauts, The
Sword of Song, the Book of the Goetia of Solomon the King,
Why Jesus Wept, Oracles, Orpheus,
Gargoyles and The Collected Works.
— The Confessions of Aleister Crowley.
New York, NY. Hill and Wang, 1969. Page 406.
______________________________
Why
Jesus Wept
exhibits love as the road to ruin. It is the sentimental point
of view about it which is the catastrophe of Sir Percy’s career.
— The Confessions of Aleister Crowley.
New York, NY. Hill and Wang, 1969. Page 557. |
|
Reviews: |
It is a work which, as far as pious innocence is concerned,
should be kept strictly under lock and key. . . . The strange
mingling of ribaldry, indecency, poetry, and wit, could be
perpetrated by no one but Mr. Crowley; and certainly no other
author would issue, under his own name, such a ruthless
violation of conventionalities. The display of Mr. Crowley’s
rampant virility does not always take a commendable turn, and
many readers will regret that his genius has been given so loose
a range. . . . It is possible that electric shocks of this
nature may prove beneficial in some cases.
—The Literary Guide, date unknown. |
|
|
|
|
|
|